striker report November, 2010 
   
striker report coffee
The Year of the (paper) Tiger: resource issues could slow China's ascent
"The great difference between our western Christian world and the atheistic Communist world is not political, gentlemen, it is moral", US senator Joseph McCarthy told an assembled crowd in Wheeling, West Virginia in February of 1950.

"Today we are engaged in a final, all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity. The modern champions of communism have selected this as the time, and ladies and gentlemen, the chips are down--they are truly down."

At the time, McCarthy and the cold warriors of the era had made political hay out of the question "who lost China?" when the world's most populist nation fell to Mao Zedong and his communist associates in 1949.

If we could travel back in time and inform the senator that not only would the west make peace with communist China, but that by 2010 the Chinese government would be the second largest foreign holder of US treasuries, it's fair to say that the anti-red crusader would probably be astounded.

But the end of the Cold War did not bring an end to alarmist rhetoric regarding China.

Indeed, the economic rise of the Middle Kingdom has inspired dire predictions of a world-wide takeover – a fear not without some basis in fact.

In August of this year, it was reported that China has overtaken Japan to become the world’s second largest economy. The International Energy Agency estimates that China has just surpassed the United States in overall energy consumption. China has been gobbling up resources from Africa to South America. The rhetorical response to China’s rise from Western media has been predictably hysterical.

"You Better Learn Mandarin Now!" shouted a recent headline from Business Insider.

"China has now become the biggest threat to the global economy" announced Britain’s Daily Telegraph in a 2009 opinion piece by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard:

"Credit has exploded. Allocated by Maoist bosses for political purposes, it has become absurd. China is rolling as much steel as the next eight producers combined. It is churning more cement than the rest of the world. Fixed investment is up 53pc this year. Once you know that Hunan authorities have torn down two miles of modern flyway so that they can soak up stimulus by building it again, or that the newly-built city of Ordos is sitting empty in Inner Mongolia, you know what must come next."

Former Morgan Stanley analyst Andy Xie concurred: "China's property market is a massive bubble."

Indeed, China bears have been licking their chops for some time now, eagerly awaiting the seemingly inevitable implosion.

They may be waiting a while longer. China's housing "bubble" in no way resembles the American phenomenon – there is no significant mortgage securitization in the market, and buyers are typically required to put down 20% up front. Demand for housing – at least in the major cities - remains firm. China's banks are controlled by the government which keeps them on a short leash. While non-performing loans are an issue, a general lack of leverage keeps them from upsetting the apple cart. With $2 trillion in reserves and a robustly expanding economy, the China juggernaut appears to be unstoppable.

Having leapfrogged Japan, will China then overtake the US?

It's possible. But China has some structural issues which have already begun to manifest, and the US has some hidden strengths that have been obscured by the recent financial crisis. Here are some key obstacles that might slow China's ascent:
  • China has only one-fifth as much water per capita as the United States. Chinese industry uses 4 to 10 times more water per unit of production than the average in industrialized nations, according to the World Bank.
  • Nearly 500 million people lack access to safe drinking water, and environmentalists have rated one third of China's river waters unfit for industrial or consumer use, according to the New York Times.
  • China's northern region is facing increased threats of desertification, while what little forested area remains is rapidly being depleted due to industrial and agricultural use.
Then there are China's pollution and health issues:
  • China's State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) concluded in June 2006 that environmental degradation and pollution cost the Chinese economy the equivalent of 10% of GDP annually.
  • A report by the Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning in 2003 estimated that 300,000 people die each year from ambient air pollution, mostly of heart disease and lung cancer. According to the World Health Organization, 74% of the population lives in areas where air quality does not meet global health standards.
  • While tobacco use has declined in the US over the last several decades, 57% of Chinese men are smokers, including 6 out of every 10 doctors and university professors. In all, tobacco kills a million Chinese a year, a figure that is expected to double by 2020.
Finally, China's export-driven growth may be a shaky foundation to begin with. Chinese policy makers have realized that they need to boost domestic consumption, but as economist and veteran China observer Michael Pettis recently put it in Foreign Policy magazine, "China cannot enjoy the double-digit GDP growth generated by low wages, cheap capital, and an undervalued currency and still have strong domestic consumer demand."

What's more, China's advantages in labor are gradually dissipating as workers demand higher wages, and going forward, Chinese policy makers may be increasingly forced to turn their attention toward domestic problems of labor, health and environment.

It has become customary to assert that the world's economic center of gravity is now shifting east thanks to American over-extension. And it is certainly true that the US faces a number of economic challenges in the near future. But American freedom still bears rich fruit in the form of creative enterprise – it was, after all, the Americans who invented the Internet, who put a man on the moon and who continues to dominate in science and technology. China's rise may be inevitable, but it would be unwise to count the US out just yet!

In This Issue:
Featured Interview(s):
From Previous Issues:
 
 Resource Links 
Published at
Striker Securities, Inc.
940 N. Industrial Drive
Elmhurst, IL 60126, U.S.A.
(800)669-8838
(312)987-0043
www.Striker.com
Contact Striker

Copyright © Striker Securities, Inc. All rights reserved.
There is a risk of loss in trading. It is the nature of commodity and securities trading that where there is the opportunity for profit, there is also the risk of loss. Commodity trading involves a certain degree of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. Derivative transactions, including futures, are complex and carry the risk of substantial losses. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Please read additional risk matters on our web site, www.striker.com. It is important you understand all the risks involved with trading, and you should only trade with risk capital. This communication is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient.

About this report The information and links on this website are for informational purposes. The risk of trading can be substantial and each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable investment. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future results. Striker is a member of the National Futures Association ("NFA"), the Managed Funds Association ("MFA"), and the National Introducing Broker Association ("NIBA"). Striker is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC"), and was formerly registered with the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Additionally, Striker is a former member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC"). FINRA is the largest non-governmental regulator for all securities business in the United States. Please read Striker Disclosure Statement for the additional disclosure.

The trading performance cited throughout our web site is based on actual trading history, unless otherwise noted. The starting account balance is based on the system developer recommendation. Striker tracks actual performance by recording and maintaining each trade ticket for each system generated. The performance information assumes that no additions or withdrawals have been made. The rate of return for all systems disclosed in the Striker Report is cumulative from the day the system actually started trading at Striker. We maintain a "life" track for all 3rd party systems. We do not necessarily base our records on any particular client account. No one particular customer has achieved these results. The percentage returns reflect inclusion of commissions and fees.The actual percentage gains/losses experienced by investors will vary depending on many factors, including, but not limited to: starting account balances, market behavior, the duration and extent of investor participation (whether or not a client takes all signals for a system) in the specified system and money management techniques.

Striker is a revolutionary concept in action: an international, professional team of brokers dedicated to trading only for clients. It bears repeating: unlike most other brokers, Striker does NOT trade futures for itself or any of its employees. This policy has been in place from the start in order to guarantee that our entire focus remains on the interests of our clientele. Striker believes that when brokers are allowed to trade for themselves (or have in-house trading practices) there is a strong potential for conflict of interest, as the broker may place more importance on his own trading activities (or that of his firm's) than on those of his clients. Finally, Striker has no financial ties to system developers, so there no bias or pressure on how we report the actual trading results posted in our client section. This section is designed specifically for Striker's clients, so they may audit their results on a daily, weekly, monthly, or annual basis.